Why Zelensky sanctioned his former press secretary Yuliia Mendel
Mendel and Zelensky (Photo from publicly available sources)

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky imposed ten-year sanctions on Yuliia Mendel, who served as his press secretary from 2019 to 2021, following a series of controversial interviews in which she repeated claims closely resembling Kremlin propaganda narratives.

The Presidentโ€™s Office said Mendel was among ten Russian and Ukrainian individuals sanctioned for spreading disinformation and Russian propaganda, as well as supporting Moscowโ€™s aggressive policy against Ukraine. The restrictions include an asset freeze and limits on trade operations.

The decision followed Mendelโ€™s May interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who has repeatedly criticized Western support for Ukraine and previously interviewed Vladimir Putin.

During the conversation, Mendel portrayed Zelensky as one of the main obstacles to ending the war. She called him โ€œone of the biggest obstacles toward peace,โ€ claimed that he โ€œthrives on this warโ€ and described the Ukrainian president as โ€œa dictator.โ€

Mendel also argued that Ukraine could not defeat the much larger Russian state and suggested that Kyiv was sacrificing its population for territory. She claimed that Ukraine and Russia were both suffering because โ€œSlavs are killing Slavsโ€ โ€” language widely associated in Ukraine with Moscowโ€™s narrative that Russians and Ukrainians are one โ€œbrotherly people.โ€

Mendel and Zelensky (Photo from publicly available sources)

She also alleged that the Ukrainian delegation had been prepared to accept Russiaโ€™s demands during the 2022 Istanbul negotiations but that Zelensky ultimately prevented an agreement. Mendel cited unnamed sources and provided no documentary evidence.

The Presidentโ€™s Office rejected the allegation, stressing that Mendel had not participated in the negotiations and had no access to decision-making at that level.

In the same interview, she made unsubstantiated allegations about Zelensky involving money laundering and drug use. Mendel also claimed that Ukraine had become an autocracy, effectively equating its political system with that of Russia.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha described her statements as โ€œlies and manipulationsโ€ that supported Russian demands and ultimatums. Ukrainian fact-checkers noted that Mendelโ€™s central messages โ€” that Ukraine cannot win, that Zelensky is prolonging the war for personal benefit and that Western military assistance only increases Ukrainian suffering โ€” echo Kremlin narratives intended to weaken international support for Kyiv.

The interview was subsequently amplified by Russian propaganda networks. A coordinated disinformation campaign also circulated fabricated front pages designed to resemble major Western newspapers, using Mendelโ€™s allegations to discredit Zelensky before an international audience.

Mendel and Zelensky (Photo from publicly available sources)

Mendel later continued making similar claims in European media, prompting Ukraineโ€™s Foreign Ministry to warn foreign journalists not to treat her as a reliable source of information.

The Ukrainian authorities have not publicly linked the sanctions to any single statement. However, the decision came after months in which Mendel used her former proximity to Zelensky to lend credibility to allegations that Ukrainian officials rejected as false and that Russian propaganda actively exploited.

Reacting to the sanctions, Mendel said she had expected such a decision following her interview with Carlson.

โ€œI knew that a โ€˜high treasonโ€™ case was being prepared over my interview with Tucker Carlson, and I suspected that sanctions were possible. This does not change my position, nor the position of millions of Ukrainians. To survive, Ukraine needs peace, not another dictatorship, even if it is Zelenskyโ€™s dictatorship,โ€ she wrote.

Mendel called sanctions against Ukrainian citizens unconstitutional and accused Zelensky of targeting people who advocate for ending the war. However, she did not directly address the authoritiesโ€™ accusations that she had spread disinformation and Russian propaganda narratives.